data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2b47/c2b4732550783c25b9164c83df4026e555f0d251" alt=""
I was recently very enlightened by reading the somewhat controversial article written by Dr. John Zmirak for Crisis Magazine’s Politics Blog. It convicted me of being something that I had always fought against; namely abortion. I had always considered myself to be staunchly pro-life until I read Amnesty Equals Abortion. Instead of rehashing the whole article I have decided to boil his whole argument down to a simple syllogism. Luckily I was blessed to have taken Logic 101 in university and am able to accomplish this.
1st Premise: Anyone who supports the granting of citizenship (and the right to vote) to a group that traditionally votes for Democrats is not pro-life.
2nd Premise: Latin American Immigrants traditionally vote for Democrats.
Conclusion: Anyone who supports granting citizenship to Latin American Immigrants is not pro-life.
Now, following the logic of this syllogism I was able to single out other groups who will no longer have my support as voting citizens in the USA. They include but are not limited to:
African Americans
Asians
Native Americans
Women
Catholics
Jews
Muslims
Non-Christians in general
Post-Graduate degree holders
Those under the age of 30
Those with an income of less than $50,000 per year
Those who are non-military
Hence the title of this article… There are not many left to vote but I am sure that the older, less educated, rich, white, protestant, military personnel will do a fine job guiding our country’s future!
You are kidding, aren't you?
ReplyDeleteI certainly hope so!
ReplyDelete